top of page

Data for Fashion Retailers: The Four Problems Nobody Talks About (But Everyone Feels)

  • Writer: Tony Paul
    Tony Paul
  • 3 hours ago
  • 7 min read

As fashion retailers look to 2026, they are adjusting with fundamentally new reality. The US tariffs have forced brands and their suppliers to rapidly adjust. Major brands like Nike, Hermès, and Ralph Lauren have already indicated or implemented price increases.

The same thing happens with the consumers as well - they’re reprioritising what to spend and where.

According to a Fashion–McKinsey State of Fashion Executive Survey This year, 46 percent fashion executives said they expect conditions to worsen in 2026, compared with 39 percent in last year’s survey.


Growth in fashion

Source: McKinsey


Let’s make this simple. Most fashion retailers face margin pressure more than they have ever faced, and they struggle against competition. One of the reasons is they lack visibility into the market.


When a quarter doesn’t go well, the reasons are usually complex. Maybe marketing missed its goals, demand dropped, or customers became more price-sensitive. Most people just read the quarterly reports and move on.


We’ve worked with a lot of fashion retailers, and the same four problems quietly show up again and again:

  1. They’re leaking revenue without realising it.

  2. The margins are getting squeezed, and it's only getting worse Quarter over Quarter.

  3. They’re failing to capture the demand when competitors run out of stock.

  4. They’re either understocked or drowning in excess inventory.


None of these happens overnight. They happen slowly — in small decisions made without a full market context.


And that’s where better data changes everything.


1. Revenue Leakage You Cannot See


Imagine this.


A competitor drops the price on a best-selling SKU by 12%. You don’t notice for five days. During those five days, conversion shifts. Not dramatically but just enough.That’s revenue leakage.


It usually happens when:


  • Pricing updates lag behind competitors.

  • Promotions aren’t aligned with market timing.

  • Premium products look overpriced next to aggressive discounters.


No one makes a bad decision on purpose. The problem is delayed awareness.


A 2% conversion shift on a hero SKU portfolio doesn’t trigger alarms. But across a season, across categories, across regions — it compounds into millions. And because it happens gradually, it rarely receives executive scrutiny.


Pricing teams often rely on internal sales signals to decide when something is “wrong.” But by the time internal data reacts, the market has already moved. They look at the conversion dashboard and, if they see a decline, check competitors manually to find out what happened.


Revenue leakage isn’t loud. It’s incremental. And incremental losses compound fast in fashion.


2. Compression from Blind Discounting


When sales slow, the default reaction in fashion is simple: discount and clear as much inventory as they can. But discounting without understanding the market is costly over time and puts more pressure on margins.


Margin compression happens when:


  • You discount while competitors are holding prices.

  • You match competitor markdowns without understanding their strategy.

  • You underestimate where you could maintain premium positioning.


If you don’t have outside benchmarks, pricing decisions become defensive.

The better question isn’t “Should we discount?” It’s “Where are we actually misaligned with the market?”


Data gives pricing teams confidence. It’s not about discounting more, but about discounting smarter or sometimes not discounting at all.


3. Assortment Gaps That Cost Market Share


This is one of the most overlooked growth opportunities in fashion. When a competitor sells out of a popular product, demand doesn’t vanish. It shifts to other retailers. The real question is: are you ready to capture that demand?


If you don’t know they're out of stock, you can’t react.


You don’t:

  • Increase bids on substitute products.

  • Highlight alternatives on your site.

  • Adjust pricing strategically

  • Push the right SKUs in email or paid campaigns.


That’s a missed opportunity. Retailers who track competitor inventory by size and color can turn stock-outs into growth opportunities. The goal isn’t to game the system, but to stay aware of the market as it changes.


4. Inventory Imbalance - Overstock vs Understock


Inventory mistakes are costly. If you understock, you lose revenue. If you overstock, you face markdown pressure. Both problems usually happen because teams don’t have enough context beyond their own sales data.


You might ask:


  • Are we underrepresented in a growing price band?

  • Are competitors expanding faster in certain silhouettes?

  • Are we over-invested in styles that are cooling off?


Internal forecasting shows what happened in the past. External benchmarking shows where the market is heading. Balanced inventory requires both.


Who Actually Uses This Data?

This isn’t just for “the data team.” In most fashion organizations, four teams benefit immediately.


1. Pricing & Revenue Teams


Pricing and revenue teams operate under constant pressure from two directions: revenue leakage on one side, margin compression on the other. To handle this pressure, they need real-time competitor pricing, historical discount data, visibility into market promotions, and cross-geography comparisons.


Without these inputs, even experienced pricing leaders are essentially making consequential decisions in the dark. They are reacting to moves that have already happened rather than anticipating the ones about to happen.


That's where  competitor pricing data changes the equation. With it, pricing teams can shift from reactive firefighting to proactive positioning. They can start protecting margins with confidence, identifying when premium pricing will hold, and avoiding unnecessary markdown spirals that erode brand equity and train customers to wait for discounts. For these teams, this kind of intelligence isn't a reporting exercise or a quarterly review artifact. It's decision fuel, consumed daily, and its absence is felt immediately in the numbers.


2. Merchandising & Assortment Teams


Merchandising teams are caught between two costly extremes: too much inventory in the wrong categories and too little in the right ones. Solving for this requires more than internal sell-through data, it requires a clear view of the competitive landscape. That means category depth comparisons, price band distribution mapping, attribute benchmarking across fabric, fit, and sustainability, and visibility into how competitors are rotating new arrivals.


With that intelligence, the nature of merchandising decisions changes. Teams can spot assortment gaps before they become lost sales, avoid overbuying into quietly declining segments, and make smarter seasonal bets grounded in where demand is actually moving. None of this replaces the instinctive experience of experienced merchandisers over the years. It sharpens it.


3. eCommerce & Growth Teams


Growth teams face a deceptively simple problem: demand that should be theirs is quietly going elsewhere. When a competitor goes out of stock, there's a window, sometimes hours, sometimes days where their customers are actively looking for alternatives.

Capturing that demand window requires knowing it's open in the first place. That means having real-time visibility into competitor stock levels, variant availability, and sell-through velocity signals.


With that intelligence, growth teams can act before the moment passes. Paid media can be redirected instantly toward high-intent audiences, substitute SKUs can be promoted to intercept redirected demand, and merchandising can be adjusted in real time to put the right product in front of the right customer. For growth teams, competitor inventory data translates directly into incremental revenue.


4. Strategy, Data & AI Teams


Data science and analytics teams are typically focused on the long game. They focus on building forecasting models, refining pricing algorithms, and finding the structural optimizations that compound over time. But even the most sophisticated models have a ceiling when they're trained exclusively on internal data. They capture what the business has done; they can't see what the market is doing.


Inventory trap

That changes when structured competitive datasets enter the picture. Historical pricing data, inventory trend patterns, assortment expansion signals, and market-wide attribute shifts give models something they can't generate on their own: external context. When competitive data feeds into forecasting and pricing infrastructure, the models stop operating in isolation. They become market-aware and market-aware models consistently outperform those built on internal data alone.


The Solution for these four problems are not Dashboards


Most retailers already have dashboards. They show revenue, conversion, sell-through, margin by category.


retailer dashboards

But dashboards are retrospective. They explain what happened inside your business.


They rarely answer:

  • Who moved pricing first?

  • Where did competitors expand assortment depth?

  • Which price bands are gaining share?

  • Which variants are disappearing fastest?


Infrastructure-level competitive data does something different than dashboards. It feeds directly into pricing engines. It informs merchandising buys. It retrains forecasting models. Dashboards describe the past. Infrastructure changes the next decision.


Performance improves when you treat competitive fashion data as infrastructure—something that feeds directly into pricing tools, merchandising workflows, and AI systems.


When pricing, merchandising, growth, and strategy teams operate from the same external market reality, alignment improves. Revenue leakage shrinks. Margin stabilizes. Stock-out opportunities turn into growth. Inventory decisions become smarter.

Data stops being a report. It becomes coordination.


Let us help you solve these four problems.


Fashion retail is moving faster than ever. Discovery is algorithmic, Pricing is dynamic and Demand shifts overnight. The four main profit killers- revenue leakage, margin compression, missed demand, and inventory imbalance, aren't unavoidable. They're symptoms of operating without full visibility. Retailers that embed structured competitive data into everyday decisions don't just react to the market. They move with it. And sometimes, ahead of it.


Datahut helps fashion retailers get there. Whether you need real-time competitor pricing, inventory signals, assortment benchmarks, or market-wide attribute trends, Datahut delivers the structured data your teams need to make faster, smarter, more confident decisions. Get in touch to see what full market visibility looks like for your business.



About the author:


I’m Tony Paul, founder of Datahut with over 15 years of experience working in the web scraping industry. We provide Data as a Service" (DaaS) to global retailers and enterprises


My core belief is that most organizations waste resources "re-inventing the wheel" when they should be focusing on the Value Layer (insights and decision-making) rather than the Commodity Layer (maintaining scrapers and infrastructure).


If you’re looking for help with web scraping, pricing , retail data or anything in between - hit me up. You can connect with me on Linkedin here: Tony Paul


FAQ SECTION


1. Why do fashion retailers need competitive data?

Fashion retailers need fashion retail competitive data to understand how competitors price products, manage inventory, and adjust assortments. This helps brands make smarter pricing, merchandising, and promotional decisions in a rapidly changing retail market.


2. How does competitive pricing data reduce revenue leakage?

Fashion retail competitive data allows retailers to monitor price changes across the market in real time. This helps pricing teams quickly adjust strategies and avoid losing conversions when competitors lower prices on similar products.


3. Can external market data improve inventory planning in fashion retail?

Yes. Fashion retail competitive data provides insights into demand trends, price band shifts, and competitor assortment strategies, enabling retailers to avoid overstocking slow-moving items or understocking high-demand products.


4. How can retailers capture demand when competitors run out of stock?

Retailers who use fashion retail competitive data to track competitor inventory levels can identify stock-outs and respond by promoting substitute products, adjusting pricing, or increasing marketing bids to capture redirected customer demand.


5. Which teams in fashion retail benefit from competitive intelligence?

Pricing, merchandising, ecommerce growth, and strategy teams benefit from fashion retail competitive data by using market insights to improve pricing decisions, assortment planning, campaign targeting, and forecasting models.


Do you want to offload the dull, complex, and labour-intensive web scraping task to an expert?

bottom of page